CRM-M-34584-2025 (O&M) - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 232 CRM-M-34584-2025 (O&M) Decided on : 17.09.2025 Prince Kumar Sharma @ Prince Sharma . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of UT, Chandigarh . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Ferry Sofat, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Manish Bansal, PP, UT Chandigarh with Mr. Jasbir Singh, Advocate, for the respondent – UT Chandigarh. Mr. Arjun Dosanj, Advocate for the complaionant. **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed here-under:- Name of Petitioner(s) FIR No. Date Section(s) Police Station District Prince Kumar Sharma @ Prince Sharma 192 28.11.2024 406, 420 of IPC [S. 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC, added later on] Sector 34 Chandigarh 2. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that, insofar as the petitioner is concerned, the respondent has already resolved the dispute, and in pursuance thereof, four demand drafts bearing Nos. “200425”, “200426”, “200427” and “200428”, all dated 15.09.2025, totaling Rs.30.00 lakhs, have been produced by the petitioner’s counsel in Court today. Copies of the said demand drafts, produced by learned counsel for the petitioner, are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Office to tag the same at the appropriate place. 3. The original demand drafts have been handed over to the JAWALA RAM 2025.09.18 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-34584-2025 (O&M) - 2 - complainant – Sunil Parmar, who is also present in person in Court along with his counsel. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that since the monetary dispute vis-à-vis the petitioner – Prince Kumar Sharma @ Prince Sharma, already stands resolved and the demand drafts amounting to Rs.30.00 lakhs have been duly received by the complainant, he has no objection if the present petition is disposed of and the petitioner is released on regular bail. 5. Heard. 6. Prayer made in the present petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/ Chief Judicial Magistrate/ Illaqa Magistrate/ Duty Magistrate concerned, if not required in any other case. 7. Needless to observe that the petitioner shall not extend any threat and shall not influence any prosecution witness in any manner directly or indirectly. 8. The observation made here-above shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the facts of the case and the Trial Court is expected to decide the case on the basis of complete evidence available on record. 9. Petition stands disposed of. Misc. application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE September 17, 2025 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2025.09.18 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document