Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73638 (ALL)

KALUA SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

CMRAD/27/2025 · 2025-08-21

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:145048-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 27 of 2025 Applicant :- Kalua Singh Opposite Party :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Gopal Misra Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.S.G.I.,Santosh Kumar Singh,Yogendra Kumar Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. Order on Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No.1 of 2025. 1. Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Asthana, Advocate bearing Advocate Roll No.A/S2299/2013 holding brief of Sri Gopal Misra, learned counsel for the review-applicant and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The review application is reported to be beyond time by 108 days. 3. The applicant has explained the delay in filing the review application in paragraph nos. 3 to 8 of the affidavit filed in support of delay condonation application. 4. We have perused the affidavit filed in support of the delay condonation application. 5. The review-applicant has properly explained the delay in filing the review application and delay in filing the review application is bona fide. 6. Consequently, the delay in filing the review application is condoned and review application shall be treated to have been filed in time. 7. Accordingly, the Delay Condonation Application is allowed. Order on Review Application. 1. Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Asthana, Advocate bearing Advocate Roll No.A/S2299/2013 holding brief of Sri Gopal Misra, learned counsel for the review-applicant and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The review-applicant by means of the present review application has prayed for review of the order dated 20.02.2025 passed by this Court in Writ-C No.26467 of 2018. 3. Learned counsel for the review-applicant has submitted several arguments on merit and tried to open the case on merit which is not permissible in exercise of review jurisdiction. Therefore, this Court does not find any error apparent in the order dated 20.02.2025. 4. In such view of the fact, no ground for review is made out. Consequently, the review application is rejected. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 Sattyarth (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J) (Saral Srivastava,J) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad