Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73613 (KAR)

SMT SAVITHRAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

RP/796/2022 · 2025-07-18

S G Pandit, S Vishwajith Shetty

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26957-DB RP No. 796 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY REVIEW PETITION NO. 796 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA W/O LATE R SEETHAPATHI AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, 2. SRI R JAGANNATH S/O LATE RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, 3. SMT. GEETHAMMA W/O SRI R SHSIVAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 4. SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE R DAYANANDA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, ALL RESIDING AT HOSAPETE GOWRIBIDANUR TOWN CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562101. …PETITIONERS (V/O DATED 09.08.2024 COURT NOTICE ISSUED TO P1 TO P4 (UNSERVED)) Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26957-DB RP No. 796 of 2022 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE- 560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT CHIKKABALLAPURA -562101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION CHIKKABALLAPURA CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562101. 4. SRI K T MANJUNATH S/O K N THIPPAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 5. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O SHANKARANARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 6. SRI R N MANJUNATHA S/O N NARASIMHAREDDY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 7. SRI G AN PRABHAKARA S/O D V NARAYANASHETTY AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 8. SRI N A SUDHAKAR S/O N A ANATHA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 9. SRI C H SUNIL KUMAR S/O C H RADHAKRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26957-DB RP No. 796 of 2022 ALL ARE RESIDING AT KARNATAKA ENTERPRISES B H ROAD, GOWRIBIDANUR TOWN CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 562101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B RAVINDRANATH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 SRI R.P. SOMASHEKHARAIAH, ADV. FOR R4 TO R9) THIS REVIEW PETITION UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC R/W ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING THAT TO ALLOW THIS REVIEW PETITION AND DISMISS THE WRIT APPEAL NO.485/2021, WHICH WAS ALLOWED IN TERMS OF ORDER DATED 22.03.202 ANNX-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) This review petition was filed on 03.11.2022. Learned counsel for the petitioners was permitted to retire from the case on behalf of the petitioners by order dated 09.08.2024. On the same order, the Registry was directed to issue court notice to the petitioners. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26957-DB RP No. 796 of 2022 2. The court notice issued to the petitioners was returned with postal shara “parties now not residing in the given address.”. 3. In the above circumstances, we have no other option, but to dismiss the review petition for non- prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the review petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1