APHC010073332025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS I.A.NO.2 OF 2025 IN/AND FIRST APPEAL NO: 88/2025 Between: 1. BALUSUPATI SIVA KUMARI,, W/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED 46 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 1-73-44, 7TH LINE, NETHAJI NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. TALLAPALLI PARVATHI, W/O KASAIAH, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O 3RD LINE, RATNAGIRI NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. BELLAMKONDA RAMNAIAH, S/O LATE BALAIAH, AGED 32 YEARS, R/O UNGUTUR VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL PALNADU DISTRICT. 3. BELLAMKONDA KOTESWARA RAO, S/O LATE BALAIAH, AGED 29 YEARS, R/O UNGUTUR VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4. NEELIKONDA MASTHANAMMA, W/O LATE PUNNAIAH, AGED 59 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 1-73-44, 7TH LINE, NETHAJI NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 30.12.2024 passed in O.S. No. 440 of 2016 on the file of the I Additional District Judge at Guntur, the appellant begs to prefer this memorandum of first appeal 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the Preliminary Decree and Judgment dated 30.12.2024 passed in O.S. No. 440 of 2016 on the file of the I Additional District Judge at Guntur pending disposal of the above Appeal Suit IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to record the compromise and allow the A.S. No. 88/2025 and pass Counsel for the Appellant: PENUMAKA VENKATA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): RAMESH N The Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT: Both the parties i.e., appellants as well respondents jointly filed the I.A.No.2 of 2025 under Order 23 Rule 1(1) of C.P.C. to record the joint compromise memo, which is filed along with this application, and to pass a decree in terms of compromise as mentioned in the said joint compromise memo. 2. Both parties present before the Court, they admitted the terms of compromise mentioned in the said joint 3 compromise memo as true and correct and gave consent to record the same. 3. Both the parties have filed their photostate-copy of Aadhaar card and they were identified by their respective learned counsel. 4. Pursuant to the above, I.A.No.2 of 2025 is ordered by recording compromise between the parties as per the terms of compromise mentioned in the joint compromise memo, which shall be part and parcel of the decree and judgment in the present Appeal Suit No.88 of 2025. 5. Since the joint compromise memo is accepted by both the parties and in view of the above mentioned circumstances, the appeal in A.S.No.88 of 2025 is disposed of by granting a decree in-terms of compromise arrived at I.A.No.2 of 2025. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier if any, stand vacated. Miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS Date: 20.08.2025 Krs 4 116 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS I.A.NO.2 OF 2025 IN/AND APPEAL SUIT No.88 of 2025 ( Common Judgment ) DATE: 20.08.2025 Krs