SURAJ COUNCILOR ALIAS GUDDU ALIAS SURAJ v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRM-M/34370/2025 · 2025-09-10
Sukhvinder Kaur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73584 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73584 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 118 CRM-M-34370-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.09.2025. Suraj Councilor @ Guddu @ Suraj ...Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Mr. Kartik, Advocate and Mr. Baljeet Beniwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Singla, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** SUKHVINDER KAUR
, J. (Oral)
Status report by way of an affidavit of Manoj Verma, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Palwa, District Palwal has been filed on behalf of respondents-State and the same is taken on record. It has been alleged in the status report that after registration of the FIR, investigation has been conducted and after completion of investigation challan was presented against accused, namely, Ishwar, Sonu and Akash, wherein charges have already been framed against them. During investigation, Ravi, Rakesh, Rajender @ Narender, Praveen son of Rajju, Vipin, Sachin, Praveen and Pradeep sons of Bijender Pandit, were not found to be involved in the commission of the offence and they were kept in column No.2. The case is now pending before the trial Court and is fixed for KOMAL 2025.09.10 13:58 I attest to the accuracy of this document
CRM-M-34370-2025 (O&M) -2- 05.12.2025 for prosecution evidence and none out of total 17 prosecution witnesses has been examined so far. Keeping the above in view, no further order is required to be passed and present petition stands disposed of in view of the aforesaid status report.
(SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE
10.09.2025. Komal
Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable? : Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.09.10 13:58 I attest to the accuracy of this document