Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7358 (UTT)

BHARTI SINGHAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/204/2025 · 2025-06-06

Alok Mahra, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:4624-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA 06TH JUNE, 2025 WRIT PETITION (S/B) No. 204 OF 2025 Dr. Bharti Singhal. …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner. : Mr. Dushyant Mainali, learned counsel. Counsel for the respondents. : Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. JUDGMENT : (per Sri G. Narendar, C.J.) The instant Writ Petition is preferred by the petitioner, apprehending her transfer to a place, not opted by her. The Writ Petition is in the nature of a preemptive action, or in the nature of a prohibition. Neither is permissible in law. There being no order, in violation of the rights of the petitioner, the Writ Petition, in our view, is premature. 2. Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition, with liberty to approach this Court, in the event any order, adverse to the interest of the petitioner is passed. 3. Reserving such liberty, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. _______________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. _____________ ALOK MAHRA, J. Dt: 06th June, 2025 Rahul 1 RAHUL PRAJAPATI Digitally signed by RAHUL PRAJAPATI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=aa4fa3bee6691397758b14516ed3e66e61 bf4c848741983ed8c39e4145cf1dab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=303B55CC3063D34AC45BF8A192FC AD15C390A1AAD7B39857D2540AE4C28A4898, cn=RAHUL PRAJAPATI Date: 2025.06.06 15:13:36 +05'30'