Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7357 (KER)

POOKOTH MUHAMMED KUNHI v. POOKOTH AYISHA

RSA/1064/2015 · 2025-10-07

Easwaran S

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BABU FRIDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 14TH ASHADHA, 1941 RSA.No.1064 of 2015 AS 16/2013 of SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR OS 117/2011 of MUNSIFF COURT, PAYYANNUR APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT NO.2 POOKOTH MUHAMMED KUNHI AGED 42 YEARS S/O. IBRAHIM, KANAMKAI, PANAPPUZHA AMSOM, ERIAM DESOM, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT BY ADVS. SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL SRI.P.S.BINU RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF & DEFENDANT NO.1 1 POOKOTH AYISHA, AGED 54 YEARS D/O. IBRAHIM, ALAKKAD, PANAPPUZHA AMSOM, ALAKKAD DESOM, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR-670306 2 SARA POOKOTH, AGED 47 YEARS D/O. IBRAHIM, KANAMKAI, PANAPPUZHA AMSOM, ERIAM DESOM, EDAKKOM P.O, THALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR- 670306 BY ADVS. SRI.O.V.MANIPRASAD SMT.A.P.RUFAIJA THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.07.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RSA.1064/2015 2 JUDGMENT I recorded on 4.7.2019 that this case was called thrice on that day. It was also recorded that never was there a representation. However one more opportunity was given and the appeal was posted to today for hearing on admission. It was also stated specifically on 4.7.2019 that no adjournment would be granted today under any circumstances. Today the case is called. Situation is the same. There is no representation on the part of the appellant. There is no point in keeping on waiting for him. The appeal is dismissed for default. Sd/- A.M.BABU Judge Mrcs/5.7.