APHC010073042019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 3274/2019 Between: 1. DUDALA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. SATYANARAYANA AGE 33 YEARS OCC EDITOR R/O. 9-124/2, SATYANARAYANA PURAM, NEAR MDO OFFICE, RAMANAYYAPETA, KAKINADA RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REPD.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETERAITE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ELURU RANGE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI. 5. THE ADDL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA POLICE, EAST GODAVARI. 6. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SARPAVARAM CIRCLE, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI. 7. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SARPAVARARN P.S, KAKINADA. 2 8. D A CHAITANYA KRISHNA, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SARPAVARAM P.S TANUKU, WEST GODAVARI. 9. GOVINDA RAJU, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SARPAVARAM P.S KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI. 10. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHI, CONSTABLE, SARPAVARAM P.S KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.3274 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent NO.6 in not taking a decision on the representation made by the petitioner dated 27.02.2019, pursuant to the directions of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.42389 of 2018 dated 22.02.2019 and the action of the respondents No.7,9 to 11 in harassing the petitioner in making him to come to police station almost every day, abusing him and ill-treating him for nothing, to wreak vengeance against him, is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 6th respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 27.02.2019, which was served on him on 28.02.2019 immediately within a period of one week and also direct respondent No.7,9 to 11, not to harass the petitioner by calling him to police station unnecessarily without there being any notice, to settle their old scores and pass…” 2. Sri B.Surya Chandra, learned Counsel representing Sri N.Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 19.09.2025 Pmk 5 28 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:3274 OF 2019 Date: 19.09.2025 Pmk