Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7356 (KER)

M/S.CREO HOMES v. UNION OF INDIA

WP(C)/16337/2019 · 2025-04-08

Mohammed Nias C P

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:KER:30403 WP(C) No. 16337 of 2019 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 16337 OF 2019 PETITIONERS: 1 M/S.CREO HOMES REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, KIZHAVANA ROAD, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN, KERALA,PIN-682 036 2 ARUN JOY, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. JOY C.V., MANAGING DIRECTOR, KIZHAVANA ROAD, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN, KERALA,PIN-682 036 BY ADVS.SREEDEVI KYLASANATH ACHUTH KYLAS R.MAHESH MENON DEAGO JOHN K. RESPONDENTS: 1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, NEW DELHI-INDIA, PIN-110 001 2 INDIAN COMPUTER EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM, (CERT-IN) REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR, ELECTRONICS NIKETAN 6, CGO, COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 003 3 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, POLICE COMPUTER CENTRE, CYBER CELL DIVISION, KERALA POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN-695 001 2025:KER:30403 WP(C) No. 16337 of 2019 -2- 4 CHERIAN NELLUVELLI ARAMANAPADI, CHANGANASSERY,KOTTAYAM-686 101 5 TONY CHERIAN, CHANGANASSERY,KOTTAYAM-686 101 *ADDL.R6 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HI-TECH CRIME ENQUIRY CELL, CYBER CELL DIVISION, KERALA POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA-695001. * ADDL.R6 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 27/09/2019 IN IA NO.02/2019 R1&R2 SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR, ASG OF INDIA R3 & ADDL.R6 SMT.SURYA BINOY, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER R4&R5 SRI.JOMY GEORGE SRI.DEEPAK MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:30403 WP(C) No. 16337 of 2019 -3- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J. --------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.16337 of 2019 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of April, 2025 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the prayers in the writ petition have become infructuous. This is recorded. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. JUDGE bpr