Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73553 (ALL)

BENCHE LAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/22681/2025 · 2025-07-15

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:115248 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22681 of 2025 Petitioner :- Benche Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajnish Kumar Srivastava,Sanjeev Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. Present petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:- "a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 26.9.2024 passed by District Inspector of Schools Kannauj (Annexure No.15 to this writ petition). b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding respondent no.2 to pass a appropriate orders appointing authorized controller for holding the election of the Committee of Management of the Institution." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without pressing the matter on merits made innocuous prayer that objection of the petitioner dated 21.02.2025 filed before Joint Director of Education, Kanpur Region, Kanpur against the order dated 26.09.2024 passed by District Inspector of Schools, Kannauj may be directed to be decided expeditiously and in time bound manner. 3. Per contra, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-Respondents vehemently opposed the instant writ petition on merit but since the petitioner has not pressed the petition on merit and only made innocuous prayer, he has no objection for allowing the same. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Awadhesh Kumar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Taking into consideration the contents made in the petition and the fact that learned counsel for the petitioner is not pressing the petition on merits and only made innocuous prayer to decide the aforesaid objection to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection, without entering into the merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. The Joint Director of Education, Kanpur Region, Kanpur is directed to decide the objection of the petitioner dated 21.02.2025 pending before him expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 7.With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad