Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7355 (JHR)

BINIMA PRASAD AND ANR v. Tourism

WPC/1800/2017 · 2025-06-26

Arun Kumar Rai

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:17043 THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1800 of 2017 1. Binima Prasad, w/o late Manoj Prasad 2. Ashwin, S/O late Manoj Prasad Both are resident of Qtr. No. CD-60, Sector-III, P.O. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi-834004 ..… Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Department of Tourism, Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at FFP Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi 3. Managing Director, Jharkhand Tourism Development Corporation, Ranchi, 5, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Ranchi .....Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Prashant Vidyarthi, Advocate For Respondent Nos.1-2 : Mr. Suresh Kumar, SC (L&C)-II Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, AC to SC (L&C)-II For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate Mr. Prakhar Hari, Advocate --------- 08/ 26th June, 2025 1. Mr. Prashant Vidyarthi, learned counsel for the petitioners is present before this Court and makes submission that petitioners do not want to proceed with the present writ petition. As such, he prays that permission be accorded for withdrawal of the same. 2. Mr. Suresh Kumar, SC (L&C)-II, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 & 2 and Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, learned counsel for respondent no.3 are present and they are having no objection on the withdrawal of the present writ petition. 3. In view of submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) Rajnish/R.K.