Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49617 WP No. 14968 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 14968 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. MAHENDRA M S/O MUTHYALANNA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/AT NO.24, 3rd CROSS, RAMAKRISHNA LAYOUT, MALAGALA , NAGARABHAVI 2nd STAGE, BANGALORE 560 091
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. P S RAJENDER., ADV.) AND:
1.
THE COMMISSIONER BBMP, NO.1 N R ROAD, BANGALORE 560 002
2.
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT,
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49617 WP No. 14968 of 2024
WEST DIVISION) BBMP, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM BANGALORE 560 086
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SANJEEV B L., ADV.)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT I.E THE ASST EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT WEST DIVISION) BBMP ON 16.06.2023 BEARING NO.
SA.KA.NI.AA/GH TYA N1/MALAPU/PR/44/23-24 WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNX-D.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49617 WP No. 14968 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the endorsement dated 16.06.2023 issued by respondent No.2 vide Annexure-D, wherein respondent No.2 has
directed the petitioner to produce the documents for considering the application for appointment on compassionate ground.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the alleged impugned endorsement is a notice calling upon the petitioner to furnish the documents. The petitioner instead of furnishing the documents, approached this Court. He submits that, if the petitioner produced the documents as mentioned in the Annexure-D, the respondents would consider the same and pass an appropriate order.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49617 WP No. 14968 of 2024
3. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents, the writ petition is
disposed of.
4. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to produce the documents mentioned in Annexure-D within two weeks and thereafter, the respondents are directed to pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.
5. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed off accordingly.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SSB