CWP-28190- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 206 MONIKA DEVI MA UNION OF INDIA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. RS Manhas, Advocate for the Mr. ADS Jattana, Advocate for the respondents. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) CM-9555-CWP Learned counsel for respondent No.5 submits that the instant writ petition is not maintainable in view of judgment by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India 2013. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner makes an oral Main Case This writ petition has been filed of the Constitution of India in the nature of certiorari for quashing the termination order dated 20.10.2018 (P No.5. -2018 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-9555 CWP Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 MONIKA DEVI MANHAS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Mr. RS Manhas, Advocate for the non applicant/petitioner. Mr. ADS Jattana, Advocate for the respondents. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) * * * * CWP-2025 Learned counsel for respondent No.5 submits that the instant writ petition is not maintainable in view of judgment by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner es an oral request to take the main petition This writ petition has been filed of the Constitution of India in the nature of certiorari for quashing the termination order dated 20.10.2018 (P - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 9555-CWP-2025 IN/AND CWP-28190-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 ….PETITIONER(S) ….RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL petitioner. Mr. ADS Jattana, Advocate for the respondents. Learned counsel for respondent No.5 submits that the instant writ petition is not maintainable in view of judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No.11378 of In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner request to take the main petition on board. This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India in the nature of certiorari for quashing the termination order dated 20.10.2018 (P-6) passed by respondent Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 (S) ) Learned counsel for respondent No.5 submits that the passed in Civil Appeal No.11378 of In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India in the nature of certiorari for quashing 6) passed by respondent NAINA KATHIAT 2025.09.12 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28190- After arguing for some time, l petitioner prays for withdrawal of t permission to take appropriate legal remedy, as per law. Prayer is accepted Dismissed as withdrawn Miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of. 10.09.2025 NainaRajput Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No -2018 (O&M) After arguing for some time, l petitioner prays for withdrawal of t permission to take appropriate legal remedy, as per law. Prayer is accepted Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. Miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 10.09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No - 2- After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with permission to take appropriate legal remedy, as per law. with liberty aforesaid. Miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No earned counsel for the with NAINA KATHIAT 2025.09.12 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document