MUKENDRA SINGH @ RAVI v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME GOVERNMENT OF U.P. AT LUCKNOW
BAIL/23855/2025 · 2025-07-10
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73507 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73507 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:111215 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23855 of 2025 Applicant :- Mukendra Singh @ Ravi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Through Principal Secretary Home Government Of U.P. At Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Dwijendra Prasad,Pradyumna Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
1. Heard Sri Dwijendra Prasad along with Pradyumna Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the informant (upon appearance filed today) and Sri Pushpendra Singh Jadon, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.330 of 2018, under Section-307 IPC, Police Station-Achhnera, District-Agra, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that for the same incident, both the parties have lodged an FIR against each other and both the parties have also suffered injuries. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. It is further submitted that charge sheet has already been filed in the present case in the year 2018, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 11.06.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. have opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence,
evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6.
Let the applicant- Mukendra Singh @ Ravi involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 S.Chaurasia Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad