- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33809 WP No. 17804 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 17804 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.JAYAMMA W/O LATE . KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RESIDING AT MARASANDRA VILLAGE,(KADATHANAMALE DAKALE) HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VARADARAJA P N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, MS BUILDING, BENGALURU 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU 560 009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU 560 009. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33809 WP No. 17804 of 2025 4. THE TAHSILDAR YELAHANKA TALUK, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU 560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V SESHU, HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 28.03.2025 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE -C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for all the respondents. 2. It is the contention of the petitioner that she being an un-authorized occupant of the house site in survey number 46 of Kadathanamale village Hesarghatta Hobli, Bangalore north additional Taluk, presently Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore Urban District, he made an application seeking regularization and accordingly, provisional grant order was passed by the Deputy Commissioner on 04.09.2012. Thereafter, the Tahasildar executed a registered sale deed in favour of the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33809 WP No. 17804 of 2025 petitioner on 01.01.2013 and the petitioner has been paying property tax to the local authorities. The grievance of the petitioner is that Hakku patra has not been issued to the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off with a direction to the 4th respondent- Tahasildar, Yelahanka Taluk, to verify from the records as to whether the facts stated herein above is true or not. 4. If it is found that the Tahsildar has indeed executed a registered sale deed in favour of the petitioner, then the Tahasildar shall proceed to issue Hakku Patra in favour of petitioner. 5. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE HR