Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73505 (ALL)

RAM PRAKASH GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/9484/2025 · 2025-07-13

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:112111 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9484 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Prakash Gautam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saroj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Siddharth Singhal,Suresh Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. Heard Srsi Saroj Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Sumeet Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 5 and Sri Vipul Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.6. The petitioner got retired on 31.11.2024, however, when his retiral dues were not cleared for about 6 months, he has approached this Court for prayer to release such amounts. Learned counsel for respondent No.6 on basis of instructions submits that due amount has already been forwarded to concerned respondent and it is duty of concerned respondent to disburse the amount to petitioner. Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 5 submits that claim for retiral benefits, if already not considered, will be considered and representation filed on 17.05.2025, will be decided within short period of six weeks. Learned counsel for petitioner on basis of above submissions made by learned counsel for respective respondents fairly submits that this writ petition may be disposed of. In the aforesaid circumstances, taking note of aforesaid submission and assurance given by counsel for respondents, this writ petition is disposed of. It is also observed that in case of default, petitioner constrains to approach this Court again seeking same relief, it may be a reason to pass an adverse order against the concerned respondents. Order Date :- 14.7.2025/P. Pandey Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad