Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73500 (BOM)

S.P.S. SCRUBING SYSTEM REPRESENTED THROUGH PARTNER TULSHIRAM BALVANT SHINDE v. SUSHANT MAHADEV PATIL AND ANR

APEAL/835/2017 · 2025-11-14

Shri Shivkumar Dige

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

5-APEAL-835-2017 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 835 OF 2017 S.P.S. Scrubing System Represented Through Partner Tulshiram Balvant Shinde …. Appellant Versus Sushant Mahadev Patil And Anr. …. Respondents ----- Mr. Mahindra Deshmukh, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Rahul V. Mane, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, A.P.P., for the Respondent – State. ----- CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2025. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for Appellant and learned APP for the Respondent No.2-State. 2. Learned counsel for Appellant on instructions seeks leave to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file appeal before the learned Sessions Court as per the view of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case Celestium Financial Vs. Ghanasekaran Etc1. 3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for 1 2005 SC 2099 Shantanu S. Dhudum 1/2 SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date: 2025.11.19 10:35:22 +0530 5-APEAL-835-2017 (CR).doc Appellant, appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 4. Appeal is dismissed and disposed of as withdrawn. 5. Learned Sessions Court shall consider the delay, if appeal is filed as application was pending before this Court. ( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum 2/2