Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73496 (KAR)

SRI. K. M. RAJENDRAN v. SRI. GOPAL REDDY

WP/24590/2024 · 2025-11-06

Pradeep Singh Yerur

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45062 WP No. 24590 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 24590 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI K. M. RAJENDRAN AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE M.KRISHNAMURTHY RESIDING AT NO.3, 1ST MAIN, C.K.C GARDEN, BANGALORE - 560027 2. SRI K.M.BABU S/O LATE M KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT CHOLANAYAKA HALLI, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJADITHYA SADASIVAN., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. GOPAL REDDY S/O THIPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS NO.3, 'AKANKSHA', 3RD CROSS, SREE SATHYA SAI BABA LAYOUT, K.R.PURAM BENGALURU -560036 …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX-A DTD 14.08.2024 IN OS NO. 4721/2010 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE XXX ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE BANGALORE Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45062 WP No. 24590 of 2024 (CH-31) AND CONSEQUENTLY A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE XXX ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE BANGALORE (CH-31) TO IMPOUND THE GPA DTD 9.05.1988 MARKED AS EX D27 IN OS NO. 4721/2010 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE XXX ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE BANGALORE (CH-31) AND FOR SUCH OTHER ORDER DIRECTION DECLARATION AS THIS HONBLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo dated 06.11.2025 contending that O.S.No.4721/2010 has been disposed of before the Trial Court and the question of considering the writ petition does not arise, which is arising out of interim order. 2. The submission and memo are taken on record. 3. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE hdk