Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73493 (KAR)

RAVI GANGAPPA SHAVI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/15872/2025 · 2025-12-05

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51164 WP No. 15872 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 15872 OF 2025 (S-REG) BETWEEN: RAVI GANGAPPA SHAVI S/O LATE GANGAPPA SHAVI, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, WORKING AS SECOND DIVISION ASSISTANT, SAGAR CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, SAGAR, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT- 577 401 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. ROCHANA P.R., ADV. FOR SRI. SRINIVAS V, ADV.) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU- 560 001 2. THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINITRATION, Digitally signed by SHILPABAI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51164 WP No. 15872 of 2025 9TH FLOOR, V.V. TOWER, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE- 560 001 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT, SHIVAMOGA- 577 401 4. THE COMMISSIONER CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, SAGAR, SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT- 577 401 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P.RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3, SRI. MANJUNATH.K, ADV. FOR SRI. VISHWANATHA.R, ADV. FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD 15.04.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-K TO THE WP AND CONSEQUENTLY TO REGULARIZE THE PETITIONER AS PER THE RECOMMENDATION DTD 29.12.2017 AND 13.06.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND J TO THE WP WITH EFFECT FROM THE DAY WHEN THE PETITIONER HAVE COMPLETED 10 YEARS OF SERVICES AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51164 WP No. 15872 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER The petitioner filed this writ petition seeking for mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 15.04.2025 vide Annexure-K, wherein the petitioner requested for regularize the service, but the respondents did not consider the representation. Hence, this writ petition. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that, if reasonable time is granted to the respondents, the respondents would consider the representation vide Annexure - K, and pass an appropriate order. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the writ petition is disposed off directing the respondents to consider the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51164 WP No. 15872 of 2025 representation vide Annexure-K dated 15.04.2025, and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within eight weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order. 4. The pending applications, if any, stand disposed off accordingly. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB