Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7349 (JHR)

PAWAN KUMAR ALIAS PAWAN KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1853/2025 · 2025-03-25

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1853 of 2025 ------ Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Singh aged about 26 years son of Bhikhri Singh resident of village-Ghorbad, P.O.-Handdih, P.S.- Giridih, Dist.-Giridih. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 25/03/2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail in connection with Nawadih P.S. Case No. 05 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.86 of 2024 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 427, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of the common intention attempted to murder the staff of the informant causing injury on his head and also damaged the swing and the tube lights put by the informant in a fair. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and those allegations are general and omnibus in nature. Drawing attention of the court to page 20-21 of the brief, which is the copy of the certified copy of the joint compromise petition filed in the court of learned ACJM, Bermo at Tenughat, it is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has been settled between the parties. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and he undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or his employees in any manner during pendency of the case hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Nawadih P.S. Case No. 05 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.86 of 2024 subject to the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or his employees in any manner during pendency of the case and will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/