118 ANJU HOUSE ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. favour of the private respondent been made without considering the actual facts and the information by the respondents to get the allotment are not correct, which facts are being ignored by the respondent 2. Chandigarh submits that as per his instructions, the allotment in fa the private respondent No.4 including the petitioner as well as the allottee will be heard and again a IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18044 Date of Decision : 09 VERSUS HOUSE ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Jhanji, Standing Counsel for U.T. with Mr. Kunal Mulwani, Sr. Standing Counsel and Ms. Urvashi Singh, Jr. Standing Counsel, For the respondent U.T., Chandigarh *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, the challenge is to the allotment made in favour of the private respondent No.4 on the ground that the allotment been made without considering the actual facts and the information by the respondents to get the allotment are not correct, which facts are being ignored by the respondent-Chandigarh Administration. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on Chandigarh submits that as per his instructions, the allotment in fa the private respondent No.4 will be kept in abeyance and all the parties including the petitioner as well as the allottee will be heard and again a IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 18044-2025 Date of Decision : 09-07-2025 ........Petitioner VERSUS HOUSE ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE CHANDIGARH ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Amit Jhanji, Standing Counsel for U.T. with Mr. Kunal Mulwani, Sr. Standing Counsel and i Singh, Jr. Standing Counsel, For the respondent U.T., Chandigarh. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, the challenge is to the allotment made in on the ground that the allotment been made without considering the actual facts and the information supplied by the respondents to get the allotment are not correct, which facts are being Chandigarh Administration. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the U.T., Chandigarh submits that as per his instructions, the allotment in favour of will be kept in abeyance and all the parties including the petitioner as well as the allottee will be heard and again a ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI In the present petition, the challenge is to the allotment made in has supplied by the respondents to get the allotment are not correct, which facts are being behalf of the U.T., vour of will be kept in abeyance and all the parties including the petitioner as well as the allottee will be heard and again a SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.10 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-18044-2025 -2- decision will be made whether the allotment made in favour of the private respondent No.4 was valid or not. In case, it is found valid, the same will be maintained by giving due reasons otherwise, the same will be cancelled and the case of the next person in the merit will be considered for allotment. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of the learned Senior Standing counsel, the present petition is disposed of as no further grievance of the petitioner survives but liberty be given to the petitioner in case, any order is passed against the interest of the petitioner, she can avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 4. Ordered accordingly. 5. Let the parties appear before the Secretary, House Allotment Committee on 21.07.2025 at 11 A.M. 09-07-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.10 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document