IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 217 CWP-28186-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.04.2025. SANDEEP ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. PRESENT: Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ankur Sheoran, Advocate, for Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate, for respondent No.3. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J (ORAL) The instant petition had been filed for setting aside the result dated 07.08.2018 issued by respondent No.2-Haryana Staff Selection Commission. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that since there are certain disputed questions of fact that now arise for determination in the present writ petition and noticing that the same cannot be gone into by the High Court in exercise of its power under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to take recourse to the appropriate alternative remedies in accordance with law. RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.04.08 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28186-2018 (O&M) -2- 3 Disposed of as withdrawn with liberties as aforesaid. 4 The period during which the present petition has remained pending before this Court shall be taken into consideration while computing the period of limitation. 5 Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand(s) disposed of accordingly. April 07, 2025. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.04.08 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document