Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73467 (BOM)

EKNATH BHAVRAO BHAMRE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

CP/434/2018 · 2025-11-14

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} 997-CP-432-2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 997 CONT. PETITION NO. 432 OF 2018 IN WP/9385/2017 Mohan Narayan Chaudhari ….Petitioner VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others …..Respondents ….. Ms. Renuka Karande h/f Mr. P.B. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A.V. Lavte, AGP for State Mr. N.N. Desale, Advocate for respondent No. 3 and 4 998 CONT. PETITION NO. 433 OF 2018 IN WP/9379/2017 Mahendra Omkar Patil ….Petitioner VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others …..Respondents ….. Ms. Renuka Karande h/f Mr. P.B. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. V.P. Dama, AGP for State Mr. N.N. Desale, Advocate for respondent No. 3 and 4 999 CONT. PETITION NO. 434 OF 2018 IN WP/9392/2017 Eknath Bhavrao Bhamre ….Petitioner VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others …..Respondents ….. Ms. Renuka Karande h/f Mr. P.B. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. G.A.Kulkarni, AGP for State Mr. N.N. Desale, Advocate for respondent No. 3 and 4 ....... Bhagyawant Punde 2025:BHC-AUG:31296-DB {2} 997-CP-432-2018 CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2025 ORDER : 1. Learned advocates for the respective parties jointly submit that the order is complied with. 2. Contempt petitions are therefore disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Bhagyawant Punde