RAJESH S/O SH. HARI PRASAD B/C BRAHAMIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/1094/2019 · 2025-09-08
Ashutosh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7346 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7346 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:36042] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1094/2019 Rajesh S/o Sh. Hari Prasad, R/o Mohalla Baidh Gali, Sapotra, District Karauli. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP.
2. Ramesh Chand Sharma S/o Ram Prasad Sharma, R/o Janta Paropkari Colony, Sapotra, District Karauli. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Goyal, Adv. Ms. Ritu Jindal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. with Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.G.A. Ms. Shivani Choudhary, Adv. for Mr. Ashish Agrawal, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order 08/09/2025
1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking quashing of the FIR No.16/2019 registered at Police Station Sapotra, District Karauli for the offence punishable under Section 447 of IPC.
2. Vide order dated 02.04.2019, Coordinate Bench of this Court
directed that challan shall not be filed in this matter.
3.
Learned counsel appearing of behalf of the State submits the factual report dated 03.09.2025, which is taken on record.
4. As per the factual report, after investigation of the aforesaid FIR, charges against the present petitioner and two other persons namely Biloti and Shivraj for the offences punishable under
[2025:RJ-JP:36042] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1094/2019] Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC have been found to be proven. As the charges against the petitioner has been found to be proven and the charge-sheet has been prepared but could not be submitted before the trial Court due to the aforesaid stay order granted by the Coordinate Bench of this Court.
5. In that view of the matter, the petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to avail alternate remedy available to him before the trial Court.
6. With the above direction, the petition is disposed of.
7. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /50