- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49653 CRP No. 7 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 7 OF 2024 (IO) BETWEEN: SRI BASAVARAJU S/O NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O BELAGULI VILLAGE, HANDANAKERE HOBLI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT - 572 214. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. D. DRUDHA GOWDA D/O S B DAYANANDA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 2 YEARS, MINOR BY N/F MOTHER B V RASHMI W/O S B DAYANANDA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/O BELAGULI VILAGE, HANDANAKERE HOBLI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 214. 2. SIDDAPPA S/O NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49653 CRP No. 7 of 2024 R/O SAGASANDRA VILLAGE, NITUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 214. 3. S B DAYANANDAMURTHY S/O BASAVARAJU, AGED ABOUR 30 YEARS, R/O BELAGULI VILLAGE, HANDANAKERE HOBI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT - 572 214. 4. BHAGYASHREE S B W/O PRAKASH D/O BASAVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O VIDYANAGARA NEAR NGO'S BUILDING, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TOWN, TUMKUR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 17.08.2023 PASSED ON IA.II IN OS NO.246/2021 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI., DISMISSING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) AND (d) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49653 CRP No. 7 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Heard Sri. R. Vijayakumar, learned counsel for the revision petitioner. 2. This Court did not deem it fit to issue notice to the respondents in view of the fact that the suit is set down for judgment today as is submitted by the counsel for petitioner. 3. This revision petition is challenging the dismissal of the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC. The suit has progressed thereafter, and the matter is now posted for judgment. 4. However, if the revision petitioner suffers any adverse order in the suit, the grounds urged in the revision petition may be urged as the grounds in the appeal as well. With the above liberty, revision petition is disposed of. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40