Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44015-DB MFA No. 6591 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6591 OF 2025 (AA)
BETWEEN:
1. BORAIAH S/O SANNA MADAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O MUTHAYYANAHATTI VILLAGE GONUR POST CHITRADURGA TALUK - 577 501 …APPELLANT (BY SRI GURUDATH V.R., ADVOCATE FOR SRI SPOORTHY HEGDE N, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. MANJANNA S/O B.C.CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS AGRICULTURIST
2. GEETHAMMA D/O. B.CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS AGRICULTURIST
3. RAKESH S/O B. CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS AGRICULTURIST
Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44015-DB MFA No. 6591 of 2025
4. THIPPESWAMY S/O MANJANNA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS AGRICULTURIST
5.
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, (SLAO - NHAI) KSRTC DEPOT ROAD CHITRADURGA - 577 501
6. MANJAMMA D/O. CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS AGRICULTURIST
7. PALAMMA D/O. B.CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS AGRICULTURIST
8. THIPPESWAMY S/O. B. CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS AGRICULTURIST
9. RAJESH S/O. MANJANNA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS AGRICULTURIST
10. CHINNAPPA S/O. LATE BAYANNA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS AGRICULTURIST
ALL RESPONDENT No.1 TO 4 AND RESPONDENT No.5 TO 10 ARE R/O. MUTHAYYANAHATTI VILLAGE GONUR POST CHITRADURGA TALUK - 577 501. …RESPONDENTS
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44015-DB MFA No. 6591 of 2025
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 37 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGEMENT AND AWARD DTD:
31-7-2025 PASSED BY THE PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT CHITRADURGA IN A.C.NO.2/2019 AN CONSEQUENTLY, ALLOW THE ABOVE APPEAL AND AWARD THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT SO DEPOSITED BY THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, SLAO FOR ACQUIRING 2,424 SQR. MTRS. OF LAND IN SY.NO.22 OF MALLAPURA VILLAGE IN FAVOUR OF APPELLANT AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the present appeal. The memo indicates that the appellant seeks liberty to file an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [A&C Act]. However, it does not appear that there is any arbitral award, which can be challenged under Section 37 of the A&C Act.
2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44015-DB MFA No. 6591 of 2025
3. However, it is clarified that this would not preclude the appellant from availing all such remedies as otherwise available in law.
Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
AHB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7