Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73435 (ALL)

DR. SUDHA RANI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/9333/2025 · 2025-07-10

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:111449 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9333 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Sudha Rani Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kaushal Kishore Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is aggrieved by the transfer order as despite he being asked to make a request for transfer at a particular place but his request has not been considered and yet the order of transfer has been passed transferring him against his request. Petitioner wants to be transferred to a place where his children are studying. 3. Learned Standing counsel has no objection in case petitioner's representation is directed to be decided by the concerned competent respondent in a time bound period and in accordance with law. 4. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the competent respondent authority to look into and consider the claim of the petitioner as raised in his representation dated 20.06.2025 and decide the same as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Deepika Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad