Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7342 (HP)

Krishna Kumar Sahni v. State of HP

CRMPM/301/2025 · 2025-02-24

Rakesh Kainthla, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Krishan Kumar Sahni vs. State Cr. MP(M) No. 301 of 2025 24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Sunny Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Navlesh Verma, Additional Advocate General, for the respondent/State. Cr. MP(M) No. 301 of 2025 Notice. Mr. Navlesh Verma, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of non-applicant/respondent/State. No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of non-applicant/respondent. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application coupled with the fact that the applicant/appellant is in custody, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay of 133 days that has crept up in filing the appeal. Ordered accordingly. Application stands disposed of. Cr. Appeal No. ___ of 2025 (Filing No. CRA/12657/2024 Appeal be registered. Admit. Call for the records. Cr.M.P. No. 2025 (Cr.MPST No. 2770 of 2024) Application be registered. Notice in the aforesaid terms. Reply, as prayed, be filed within four weeks. List on 17.03.2025. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge ( Rakesh Kainthla) Judge February 24th, 2025 (ravinder/pathania)