M/S NIMMAKAYALA VENKATRATNAM AND SONS v. STATE BANK OF INDIA
WP/3279/2018 · 2025-01-09
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, R Raghunandan Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7342 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7342 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3279 OF 2018 Between:
1. M/S Nimmakayala Venkatratnam and Sons, Rep by its Managing Partner, Sri Nimmakayala Satyanarayana, S/o Late Venkatratnam Kakinada Mandal, E G District. 2. Sri Nimmakayala Satyanaryaana, S/o Late Venkatratnam Kajuluru R/o 3-9-11/1 near Yechuri Kakinada E G District K, paparao House Lane Kannaiah Kapu Nagar ...PETITIONERS AND
1. State Bank of India, rep by its Authority Officer, Gollapalem Branch E G District, A.P ^
2. Katta Prassana Kumar, s/o late Jagga Rao, R/o. 2-32 PRGC Chidiga Kakinada AP Y Colony, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the lA No 500/2015 in SA No 169/2015 pending on the file of DRT visakhaparnam and quash the same by holding it as iilegai, arbitrary, non application of mind and cannot be justified in the eye of iaw and consequently to allow
the lA No 500 of 2015 in SA No 169/2015 pending on the file of DRT ^vieakhapatnam in the interest of justice. lA NO:
1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to create any encumbrance and not to^^le^with in any manner on the secured assets pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice. lA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order passed by this Hon'ble Court made in W.P.No.3279 of 2018, dated 25.06.2018.
lA NO: 5 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in SA.No. 169/2015 on the file of the Debt Recovery Tribunal Visakhapatnam. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI RAMA MOHAN PALANKI (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent No.I.SRI CHALLA SREENIVAS REPRESENTING SRI K B RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI V S R ANJANEYULU (SENIOR COUNSEL) The Court made the following: ORDER
m Bench Sr.No:-41 [3446] APHC010074192018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 3279 of 2018 ...Petitioners M/s Nimmakayala Venkatratnam & Sons and another Vs. ...Respondents State Bank of India and others ********** NONE Advocate for Petitioners Mr. Challa Sreenivas representing Mr. K B Ramanna Dora for R.1 Mr. V S R Anjaneyalu, Sr. Counsel for Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): R.2
CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICER RAGHUNANDANRAO : 9*’’ January, 2025 DATE P C : None for the petitioners. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- K. KASIRAO ACHARi ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri Rama Mohan Palanki Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to Sri K B Ramanna Dora Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri V S R Anjaneyulu Advocate [OPUC]
4. Three CD Copies TF
HIGH COURT DATED;09/01/2025
ORDER WP.No.3279 of 2018 o 0 7 FEB 2025 m O to . Current Section !5s£ffSPATC\^ ity<' WITHcSr^OSlI'^ '’' non-prosecution,