Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010028092019 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1050/2019 RAJU KUMAR BASUMATARY AND 4 ORS. S/O- MEGHNATH BASUMATARY, VILL- KACHIRTARI, P.O. SAUDARVITA, DIST- BAKSA, ASSAM 2: MILTAN BASUMATARY S/O. BANIN BASUMATARY VILLAGE- SANPURIA P.O. CHAIBARI DIST.- BAKSA ASSAM. 3: BIDUT SWARGIARY S/O. DHANESWAR SWARGIARY VILLAGE- KHALIHAGURI P.O. MUSHALPUR DIST.- BAKSA ASSAM. 4: MITHUN BASUMATARY S/O. LT. GANESH BASUMATARY VILLAGE- AMBARI P.O. MUSHALPUR DIST.- BAKSA ASSAM. 5: SIMANGSHA BASUMATARY S/O.LT. NRIPENDRA NATH BASUMATARY VILLAGE- MADHYA NARAYANPUR P.O. NARAYANPUR DIST.- BAKSA ASSAM VERSUS Page No.# 2/3 THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. TO BE REP. BY THE CHIEF SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY-6 2:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL TO BE REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY KOKRAJHAR ASSAM. 3:THE DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS AND SURVEYS BODOLAND KOKRAJHAR ASSAM. 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BAKSA DIST.- BAKSA ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A R BHUYAN, MR. S AHMED,MR. M A I HUSSAIN,MR. R HAQUE,MS S BEGUM Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, BTC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 05.03.2025 Heard Shri MA Mazarbhuiya, learned counsel appearing on instructions of Shri AR Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. RB Bora, learned Standing Counsel, BTC. The cause of action pertains to a process for undergoing six months Records Class Course Training (RCCC training) which was published by a notice dated 24.01.2011. The grievance of the petitioners is that in spite of participating in the aforesaid process, they were not given the benefit in the existing/probable vacancy of Lot Mandals/ Recorders. Page No.# 3/3 Shri Mazarbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioners has, however, fairly submitted that though this writ petition was filed in the year 2019 and notice was issued on 08.04.2019, thereafter the petitioners are not in touch. He accordingly has expressed difficulties in prosecuting the present cause of action. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is closed as it appears that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the same. JUDGE Comparing Assistant