IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (230) CWP No. 29725 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.04.2025 Hari Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Rajinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Akshita Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the petition, an order adverse to the interest of the petitioner has been passed on 21.09.2022, which needs to be challenged, hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to challenge the said order dated 21.09.2022. 2. Ordered accordingly. 3. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of. April 21, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) kanchan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No Kanchan 2025.04.22 17:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment