Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73405 (PNJ)

SURESH KUMAR AND OTHERS v. ASHOK KUMAR MEENA (IS) MANAGING DIRECTOR, UHBVN & ANOTHERS

COCP/3319/2025 · 2025-08-04

Sudeepti Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3319-2025 Date of decision: 04.08.2025 SURESH KUMAR AND OTHERS ..Petitioners Versus ASHOK KUMAR MEENA (IS) MANAGING DIRECTOR, UHBVN & ANOTHER ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Sidharth Maini, Advocate for Mr. I.P.S. Kohli, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.K. Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for respondents. SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J. (Oral) 1. The contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 19.02.2025, passed by this Court in CWP-3967-2025. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents contends that in compliance of order dated 19.02.2025, speaking order dated 08.07.2025 has been passed, which is attached with the compliance report as Annexure R-1/1. This fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. Para 4 of the compliance report dated 18.07.2025, is reproduced as under:- “4. That the department has called all the petitioners for personal hearing who were 128 in Number through video MOHD AYUB 2025.08.06 12:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-3319-2025 -2- conferencing and mostly the petitioners have put their claim before the competent authority UHBVNL. After hearing the petitioners, the competent authority have accepted the claim of two candidates i.e. No. 2 (Hemraj) & No. 4 (Pawan) whereas rejected the request of the remaining petitioners by passing a well-reasoned detailed speaking order vide No. 153/UH/GA-604/CC dated 08.07.2025 (Annexure- R-1/1) because they are ineligible for the inter-utility transfer.” 4. A perusal of speaking order dated 08.07.2025, shows that order dated 19.02.2025, passed in CWP-3967-2025, has been complied with. 5. In view of the above, the civil original contempt petition is dismissed. The contempt is purged and rule is discharged. August 04th, 2025 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Ayub JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MOHD AYUB 2025.08.06 12:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.