SUKHDEV SINGH & ORS v. HARYANA POWER GENERATION CORP LTD & ANR
CWP/8661/2016 · 2025-07-28
Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73400 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73400 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-8661-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (228) CWP-8661-2016 Date of Decision : July 28, 2025 Sukhdev Singh and others .. Petitioners Versus Haryana Power Generation Corporation Ltd and others
.. Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Mukul Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Nikita Sharma, Advocate, for Ms. Supriya Garg, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as the Award dated 30.04.2013 (Annexure P-9) has already been implemented qua the similarly situated workmen and in case, any of the petitioner has not been granted the benefit under the aforementioned Award, liberty be given to the petitioners to approach the respondents to claim the same benefit of the revised pay scale, if not already extended, which benefit was extended to the similarly situated employees, by filing appropriate representation.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case any representation/claim is received at the hands of the petitioners, the same will be considered and appropriate order on the said representation/claim will be passed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of any such claim and in case, after the decision any relief is to be extended to the petitioners, the same will be extended, otherwise due reasons will be HARSHA RANI 2025.08.01 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-8661-2016
2 mentioned in the speaking order to be passed for not accepting the claim of the petitioners, which reasons will be conveyed to the petitioners for their information and necessary action.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the respondents, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate representation with the respondents.
4. Ordered accordingly.
5. Civil miscellaneous application pending if any, also stands
disposed of. July 28, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.08.01 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document