Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 734 (UTT)

JAGDISH LAL VERMA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/9/2025 · 2025-01-07

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:208 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS No.09 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Ajeet Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Ramesh Chandra Joshi, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Since petitioner submitted an application for V.R.S., which appears to be conditional, therefore, V.R.S. application, which is conditional one, cannot be accepted. If petitioner wants V.R.S., he should move an application for V.R.S., as per law without putting any condition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with a liberty to move a fresh application for V.R.S. to the competent authority, as per law. 5. Permission, so prayed, is granted. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to move an application for V.R.S., as per law, and if such an application is moved for seeking V.R.S. within a week from today, respondents shall consider the same, preferably in accordance with law, within a month by a reasoned and speaking order. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 07.01.2025 Arti ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.01.09 10:41:56 +05'30'