SASANALA NAMITHA, v. THE STATE OF A.P. REP., BY ITS PP & 5 OTHERS
CRLRC/614/2012 · 2025-07-06
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7339 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7339 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010073642012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 614/2012 Between:
1.SASANALA NAMITHA,, W/O. VENKATESWARA RAO R/O. DOOR NO.
6/88, NAIDU STREET, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF A P REP BY ITS PP 5 OTHERS, REPT. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P.,HYDERABAD.
2.THAMMISETTY VENKATA RAMESH, S/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH R/O.
CNT HALL ROAD, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
3.THAMMISETTY VENKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH R/O. CNT HALL ROAD, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
4.THIMMISETTY VENKATA LAKSHMANA, W/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH R/O. CNT HALL ROAD, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5.THAMMISETTY VENKATA RAMANA RAMANA, S/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH R/O. CNT HALL ROAD, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
6.THIMMISETTY SATYAM, S/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH R/O. CNT HALL ROAD, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner does not want to prosecute the case further. In view of the above submission, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 07.07.2025 VTS