Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7338 (UTT)

SURENDRA SINGH BHANDARI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/252/2021 · 2025-07-01

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sl. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPSB No. 252 of 2021 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. M.S. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Sushil Vashistha, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Subhash Upadhyay, .J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, .J.) 01.07.2025 Navin