RAMESH CHANDRA PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/14941/2025 · 2025-09-15
Rajiv Gupta, Rajiv Lochan Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73375 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73375 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 14941 of 2025 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner and, as such, he does not intend to press the writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
2. Learned AGA for the State has no objection.
3. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. September 16, 2025 Kushal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manu Khare, Satya Prakash Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Atul Kumar Tiwari, G.A., Prince Kumar Srivastava, Saumitra Dwivedi (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Ramesh Chandra Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad