Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73368 (ALL)

ASAD ULLAH KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/9353/2025 · 2025-07-17

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:117374 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9353 of 2025 Petitioner :- Asad Ullah Khan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manava Nand Chaurasiya Counsel for Respondent :- Archana Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Manava Nand Chaurasiya, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mrs. Archana Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.2 as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition for a direction upon respondent no.2 to transfer/adjust the petitioner towards his first option chosen by the petitioner at Kamalganj, Police Station- Takiya, Farrukhabad in pursuance of the Government order dated 13.06.2025, issued by the respondent no.2 to all the District Basic Education Officers of Uttar Pradesh with regard to inter-district transfer/adjustment and a further prayer to direct the respondent no.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 03.07.2025 with speaking and reasoned order without stipulated period. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for ventilation of his grievances, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned by moving representations. However, despite several representations moved by the petitioner, no heed has yet been paid. Learned counsel for the State-respondents submits that in case petitioner moves fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.2-Sachiv, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad U.P. at Prayagraj, within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 18.7.2025 Kalp Nath Singh Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad