CHOPAN NISHAD NAVIK AVEM MATSYA JEEVI SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/21979/2025 · 2025-07-31
Manoj Kumar Gupta, Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:129321-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21979 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chopan Nishad Navik Avem Matsya Jeevi Sahkari Samiti Limited Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gulrez Khan,Javed Husain Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
1. Heard Sri W.H. Khan, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri J.H. Khan, for the petitioner and Sri Rajeev Gupta, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- respondents.
2. The petitioner was having a contract for fisheries rights for a period of ten years from 17.2.2021 to 30.6.2030. Under Government Orders dated 27.8.2018 and 25.9.2023, there is provision for assessing the work of the contractor to entitle the contractor to work beyond five years. The petitioner filed an application on 6.6.2025 for extension.
3. The impugned order has been passed on 25.6.2025 whereby the contract has been cancelled on the ground that work of the petitioner was not satisfactory, it having violated the conditions of the Government Order and has also failed to pay installments in time.
4. It is submitted by Sri W.H. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner will make a proper representation in the light of the allegations made against the petitioner in the impugned order and prays that same be directed to be decided.
5. Sri Rajeev Gupta, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection to the same.
6. Accordingly, we dispose of the instant petition by providing that the petitioner shall make exhaustive representation alongwith true attested copy of the instant order before respondent no. 2 within one week from today and respondent no. 2 will decide the same by a speaking order within next two weeks. The impugned order will abide by the decision that would be taken by respondent no. 2 on
the representation of the petitioner. . (R.M.N. Mishra, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Dhirendra/ Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad