Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73344 (PNJ)

RITIKA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/37381/2025 · 2025-07-17

Kirti Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-37381-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.134 CRM-M-37381-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 17.07.2025 Ritika ..... Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Ms. Manpreet Ghuman, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral) This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking direction to the official respondent(s) to take action on representation dated 20.06.2025 (Annexure P1). 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has filed a representation dated 20.06.2025 (Annexure P1) before respondent No.2 raising her grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereupon. She further submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if, appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2, to consider and decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and to take necessary action thereupon. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Served with an advance copy of the petition, Mr. Anmol Malik, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent(s)-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. RAMANDEEP SINGH 2025.07.17 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-37381-2025 (O&M) 2 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner and without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the aforesaid representation dated 20.06.2025 (Annexure P1) of the petitioner expeditiously, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. 6. Needless to say, if any threat perception is found to the petitioner, the official respondents would provide her adequate security in order to protect her life and liberty. (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE 17.07.2025 Ramandeep Singh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAMANDEEP SINGH 2025.07.17 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document