Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:130825-DB Court No. - 45 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 14957 of 2025 Petitioner :- Om Prakash Yadav Respondent :- State Of Up And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shaiwal Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Hon'ble Sandeep Jain,J.
1. Present petition has been filed praying for following reliefs:
"i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding directing to the respondent No.-2,3, 4 and 5 to right to protect petitioners peaceful consumption his owned property and do not interfere and torture to petitioner and his family member to sale his property to the opposite parties no 6 and withdraw his case. ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature quo warranto to respondent no 3,4 and 5 that in which province are they stopping the construction of toilets in petitioner property and torture to petitioner and his Family member to compromise and make a deal with opposite party no 6 to sale his property in favor of opposite party no 6 otherwise in a false case and ruin petitioner and his family member life.. iii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature mandamus directing and commanding to the respondent No.-2 that to make inquiry committee should be formed against opposite party No. 3,4, 5 and others to investigate how much of their report is correct and how much is wrong and it if is found to be wrong then departmental action should be taken against whoever is found
guilty/wrong. 2. It is apparent from the documents annexed with the writ petition that an ex-parte temporary injunction dated 21.07.2027 was granted to the petitioner by the Civil Court, Shahganj, Jaunpur. Through, the ex-parte temporary injunction, defendants in the case have been restrained from interfering over the suit property. The injunction has been granted in Original Suit No.771 of 2017. 3. It is the claim of the petitioner that respondent no.6 who is the defendant in the aforesaid original suit along with respondent nos.2 to 5 is coercing the petitioner to either enter into a compromise regarding the suit property or to execute a sale deed regarding the suit property. Hence, the present writ petition with the aforesaid reliefs. 4. The prayers made in the petition are not maintainable.
No writ or order can be issued by this Court for reliefs as prayed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 5. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 4.8.2025 S.A. Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad