17/11/2025 D/L – 64 Court No.28 S. Kundu Rejected C.R.M.(A) 3568 of 2025 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Raiganj P.S. case no. 922 of 2025 dated 19.8.2025 under Sections 85/115(2)/109/118(2) of the BNS. In the matter of: Mukti Roy Ghosh & Anr. ...Petitioners. Mr. Kunal Ganguly …for the petitioners. Mr. Amitabha Ghosh Ms. Nabita Chatterjee …for the de-facto complainant. Mr. Prasun Kr. Dutta Mr. Mainak Gupta …for the State. 1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties. 2. Perused the case diary. 3. Considering the incriminating materials available in the case diary including the injury report, the MRI of brain, which shows punctate foci of blooming seen in the interhemishperic fissure at the mid point noted-lightly microbled, I do not consider this to be a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. 5. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)