Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7331 (CHH)

VIYATA CHANDA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/956/2025 · 2025-05-02

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:20350-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 956 of 2025 , 1 - Viyata Chanda C/o Mrinal Kanti Chanda Aged About 37 Years R/o 321, Phase 2, Harimodal Nursery School, Rajkishore Nagar, Lingiyadih, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 495006 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary Department Of Public Health And Family Welfare Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh, 495001 2 - Secretary National Medical Commission Pocket 14 Sector 8, Dwarika Phase 1, New Delhi 3 - Secretary Rehabilitation Council Of India, Nrcp Colony, Block B Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi, Delhi, 110016 4 - Dean and Medical Superintendent Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Sciences (CIMS), gol bazar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 495001 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Pandey, Advocate For Respondent No.1 & 4 /State For Respondent No.2/NMC : : Mr.Shashank Thakur, Deputy Advocate General Mr. Samrath Singh Marhas, Advocate 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 02/05/2025 The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers: “A. to declare the clause 3 Entry No.11, Column No.5 of Gazette Notification dated 9.11.2024 issued by order and in the name of Hon’ble Governor by Special Secretary, Department Public Health and Family Welfare, State of Chhattisgrh unconstitutional and void to the extent of providing the qualification recognized by the National Medical Commission. B. To direct respondent No.4 to consider the application of petitioner for the post of Clinical Psychologist in the CIMS Hospital. C. Grant any other relief as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. Mr. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that the matter be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition with proper array of parties and proper pleadings as subsequent development has taken place. 3. In view of the above submission, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.05.03 11:56:13 +0530