ISHFAQ AHMAD MALLA v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANOTHER. (HOME DEPARTMENT)
WP(Crl)/174/2023 · 2025-05-01
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Criminal)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7329 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7329 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 16 Regular List IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(Crl) 174/2023 ISHFAQ AHMAD MALLA …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Wajid Mohammad Haseeb, Advocate. Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND ANR. …Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, Dy. A
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE O R D E R 01.05.2025
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that with the efflux of time, the detention period has already expired and the
learned counsel for the respondents also acknowledges the same. His statement is taken on record.
In the light of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 01.05.2025
“Shahid-SS”