Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73288 (ALL)

BACHAN RAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/9349/2025 · 2025-07-17

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:117373 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9349 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bachan Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Srivastava,Saroj Kumar Ram Counsel for Respondent :- Bipin Bihari Pandey,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Bipin Bihari Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.2 as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition for a direction upon respondents to decide the claim of petitioner in the light of judgment/order passed by this Hon'ble Court as well as Hon'ble Supreme Court and Government order dated 12.06.2024 and re-fix the pension of petitioner with grant benefit of annual increment dated 01.07.2012, in accordance with law. At the very outset, learned counsel for respondent no.2-Basic Education Officer, District- Ghazipur on the basis of instructions submits that the claim of the petitioner with respect to re-fixation of pension and grant benefit of annual increment has already been decided. on 16.07.2025. Accordingly, the matter has become infructuous. The instructions passed on to the Bar today, are kept on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not give a satisfactory reply to aforesaid. Accordingly, the preset petition is dismissed as infructuous. Needless to say that, in case the petitioner aggrieved by any wrong calculation being done by the authorities concerned, he is at liberty to file a writ petition. Order Date :- 18.7.2025 Kalp Nath Singh Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad