Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73282 (KAR)

MR.NARASIMHA PRASAD @ RAJANNA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH

CRL.P/830/2025 · 2025-09-10

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36042 CRL.P No. 830 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 830 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. MR.NARASIMHA PRASAD @ RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS SON OF NARASIMHAIAH RESIDING AT MAGADI TOWN 3RD WARD HARIJANA COLONY THIRUMALE MAGADI TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 120. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJANNA B.C, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH TAVAREKERE POLICE STATION RAMANAGARA-562 130. REPTD BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU-560001. 2. MR. K.B. NARASIMHAIAH SON OF BAJJAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 488 1ST MAIN ROAD Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36042 CRL.P No. 830 of 2025 SANJEEVININAGAR MUDULPALYA BENGALURU-560072. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S. 482 CR.P.C (FILED U/S.528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.7112/2022 ARISING OUT OF CRIME NO.250/2022 OF TAVAREKERE POLICE STATION MAGADI FOR THE OFFENCE P/US/ 417, 420, 465, 467, 471 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AGAINST THE PETITIONER WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MAGADI, RAMANAGARA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER Though the petitioner's counsel has vehemently argued and contended that the present petitioner, who is accused No.5, had no role in the alleged forgery in creating the document styled as Cancellation of the Agreement, this Court is inclined to accede to the arguments. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36042 CRL.P No. 830 of 2025 2. Though petitioner's counsel initially has tried to made an attempt that he is only a scribe and he has no role in the said crime, however, this Court has noticed that the charge sheet material gives an indication that there are some materials to proceed against the petitioner, at this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner has sought leave to withdraw the petition. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15