Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73280 (PNJ)

SAISTA ETC v. MANJEET SINGH KHANNA & ANR

FAO/10342/2014 · 2025-09-03

Pankaj Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FAO-10342-2014 (O&M) & FAO-297-2015 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 230 Date of decision : 03.09.2025 1. FAO-10342-2014 (O&M) Saista and others ...... Appellants versus Manjeet Singh Khanna and another ...... Respondents 2. FAO-297-2015 (O&M) Partap Singh and another ...... Appellants versus Manjeet Singh Khanna and another ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the appellants. None for the respondent-Insurance Co. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Appellants are in appeal aggrieved of the order dated 14.08.2014 passed by Commissioner under the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923. Appellants seek enhancement of compensation. 2. The only plea for enhancement is with respect to penalty. From the records, it is discernible that show cause notice with respect to penalty was issued at the time of passing of this order and the said issue was kept pending by the Commissioner. DINESH KUMAR 2025.09.05 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document FAO-10342-2014 (O&M) & FAO-297-2015 (O&M) 3. In view thereof, finding no merits in the present appeals, the same are ordered to be dismissed. 4. Liberty is granted to the claimants-appellants to pursue the issue with respect to penalty before the Commissioner. 5. Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed off. 5. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected case. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 03.09.2025 Dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No DINESH KUMAR 2025.09.05 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document