- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39830 CRP No. 725 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 725 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. K.S. SAMIULLA S/O LATE KAMTEDAR AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 2. SMT. K.S. GULAB JAN W/O K.S. SAMIULLA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO. 1096, 7TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN, NEAR SAI BABA ASHRAM, BTM LAYOUT 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 029 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. SYED MUSTAFA S/O SRI. SYED RASOOL SAAB, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.53, 4TH CROSS, NEAR INDIAN SCHOOL, KANAKANAGAR, YELACHENAHALLI, BANGALORE- 560 078 Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39830 CRP No. 725 of 2025 2. SRI. RAVIKRISHNA REDDY S/O KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 3. SRI. RAGHUPATI BHAT S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONERS AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 4. SRI. RAMA REDDY N S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONERS AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 5. SRI. MANJUNATH N S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONERS AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 6. SRI. V. R. MARATHE S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONERS AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 6 ARE HAVING OFFICE AT NO.613/40/1, DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, PRAKASH NAGAR, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 021 …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DT.12.09.2025 PASSED IN O.S. NO.6391/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE XVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, (CCH-16), BENGALURU, ALLOWING IA NO.2/2025 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39830 CRP No. 725 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Heard, Sri, Praveen S., learned counsel for the revision petitioner. 2. In the revision petition, what is under challenge is non granting ex parte temporary injunction by the Trial Court. 3. In other words, there is no order at all which is capable of revising by this Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 4. Hence, office objections with regard to the maintainability is upheld and the revision petition is dismissed. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC CT-SG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14