AMAR PAL SINGH AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/22007/2025 · 2025-07-13
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Vinod Diwakar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73274 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73274 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:112812-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22007 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amar Pal Singh And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Singh Rathore Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- respondent.
2. The instant writ petition has been preferred inter-alia with the following principal reliefs:
"i. Issue a writ, order and direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to remove the encroachment and 7 feet high heap of soil. ii. Issue a writ, order and direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents in case of land acquisition the on-site measurement report should be obtained again regarding the length of gata no. 616 according to the Tehsil report dated 20.03.2018."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for redressal of their grievance, the petitioners have already made detailed representations to the respondents on 16.04.2025, 09.05.2025 and 26.05.2025, which are pending for consideration.
4. Learned Standing Counsel very fairly that in case any such representation is still pending and has not been considered by the authority, the same will be considered and decided expeditiously.
5. In view of the above, on consent and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of finally asking the petitioners to move a fresh representation before the
respondent no. 4 ventilating their grievance within two weeks from today and in case any such representation has been preferred the same would be looked into, examined and remedied strictly in accordance with law within six weeks thereafter but certainly after affording opportunity of hearing to all stakeholders including revenue officials. Order Date :- 14.7.2025 A.K.Srivastava Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad