- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37486 WP No. 20007 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 20007 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. NAGARATHNA NIRANJAN W/O, SRI.NIRANJAN. SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HER LR’S 1. SRI NIRANJAN S/O LATE PARASHIVAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS. 2. SRI NAVEEN N., S/O. NIRANJAN P., AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. 3. SRI NAREN N., S/O NIRANJAN P., AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. RESIDING AT NO. 17, SOWRABHA, 1ST CROSS, MADHAVANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 032. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI A.MADHUSUDHANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI R.M.VEERENDRA KUMAR S/O K.MADAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT RAGIBOMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37486 WP No. 20007 of 2025 KIRUVAGILU HOBLI, MALLAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR STATE BANK OF MYSORE (NOW STATE BANK OF INDIA) HEAD OFFICE, K.G.ROAD BENGALURU – 560 069. 3. THE MANAGER STATE BANK OF MYSORE (NOW STATE BANK OF INDIA) MALAVALLI BRANCH, MALAVALLI MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 430. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI RAJA L., ADVOCATE FOR R1; VIDE ORDER DATED 03/09/2025 NOTICE TO R2 AND R3 IS D/W) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 04.04.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MALVALLI IN I.A.NO.9 IN O.S.NO.14/2009 FOUND AT ANNEXURE-G, ALLOW THIS WRIT PETITION WITH COSTS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition, on the score that the petition is rendered infructuous. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37486 WP No. 20007 of 2025 2. The memo reads as follows: “The Petitioners have filed the above writ petition challenging the order passed by the court below rejecting the application filed by them for amendment of the written statement. During the pendency of the writ petition, the Respondent had filed an application before the court below seeking for impleading his son as a Plaintiff and the said application came to be allowed by the court and after the amended plaint was filed, the Petitioners were permitted to file the additional written statement and they have filed the additional written statement before the court below incorporating the amendments which were sought in the application filed before the court below. The said additional written statement has been taken on record by the court below and the proposed amendments are part of the said additonal written statement filed by the Petitioners. In this background, the above writ petition has become infructuous and the same does not survive for consideration. In the background of what is stated above, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above writ petition as having become infructuous, in the interest of justice and equity.” In terms of the memo, the writ petition is disposed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 71